Illustrative · unadmitted · revision 1

RF/acoustic-controlled multimode optical operator

This is a proposed definition for criticism. It is not an experiment run, result, evidence claim, canonical admission, inventory record, or procurement request.

Stable identifier
rf-acoustic-multimode-optical-operator
Kind
physical
Intent
discrimination

Exact target

  • external-reference · rf-acoustic-multimode-optical-operator — operator-supplied RF/acoustic optical operator proposal

Minimal decisive protocol

RF/acoustic operator matrix test

Drive a multimode optical medium with independently logged RF and acoustic controls, reconstruct the complex mode-to-mode operator, and compare it with a field-off and single-control model.

  1. Calibrate RF phase, acoustic delay, and modal readout.
  2. Run randomized control waveforms and basis-mode inputs.
  3. Acquire complex output modes and synchronized drive logs.
  4. Compare full, RF-only, acoustic-only, and field-off operators.

Decision rule: The joint operator claim survives only if full-control outputs require the joint drive model beyond each ablation.

Controls

  • ablated: RF drive only. (acoustic drive; Joint operator contribution should be absent.)
  • ablated: Acoustic drive only. (RF drive; Joint operator contribution should be absent.)

Observables and units

Observables
ObservableUnitsMeasurementUncertainty reporting
complex mode operatordimensionlessbasis-resolved complex transfer matrixreport phase, delay, and detector covariance
control-to-output latencynscross-correlation of logged drive and outputtimestamp and sampling uncertainty

Calibration and repetitions

  • RF/acoustic relative delay: common trigger and reference pickup — delay residual below phase-equivalent tolerance (ns)

Replicate unit: independent control waveform; minimum 30, independent 6.

Randomization: waveform, basis mode, and control order randomized

Stopping rule: complete balanced control blocks

Uncertainty: drive phase noise, acoustic delay, modal cross-talk, medium drift; complex transfer covariance with synchronized nuisance traces; publish all control waveforms and raw outputs

Success and falsifiers

Success

  • The jointly driven operator is not explained by the RF-only, acoustic-only, or field-off controls. (held-out model residual < predeclared margin normalized residual)

Falsifiers

  • An ablated or linear model predicts the joint output within the same tolerance. (residual improvement <= predeclared threshold fraction)

Required capability groups

  • control · required, any-one, quantity 1: independently phase-logged RF and acoustic controller (system) — synchronized drive logs and safety interlocks
  • independent-pickups · optional, at-least-n, quantity 2: independent RF phase pickup (channel) — independent source and pickup trace
  • independent-pickups · optional, at-least-n, quantity 2: independent acoustic delay pickup (channel) — independent transducer pickup and timestamp

Related capability types: Independent RF/acoustic multimode controller

Confounds and raw artifacts

  • a shared electrical driver creates an unlogged joint channel: independent pickups and timing audit; mitigation: separate source and shield paths
  • synchronized-drive-and-mode-trace · binary acquisition plus JSON · retain raw timestamps and waveform hashes

Nonclaims

  • A measured operator is not evidence of a new physical law.
  • No optical processor performance or deployment is claimed.

Provenance boundary

The citation supplies acousto-optic context only; it does not support a joint RF/acoustic operator claim.

Agent-readable JSON · History · Provenance · Back to experiments